Is LeBron James wrong for the way he handled things? Yes.
Should he be criticized and placed under severe scrutiny? Yes.
Does Cleveland have every right to be pissed? Absolutely.
Are these comments from Cleveland Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert justified? Not just no, but hell no.
I understand that the way LeBron has handled this process over the past couple of years has been immature and sad, but be the bigger man here Dan. You're a majority owner of a professional sports frachise and you just ruined your chances of possibly ever signing a big name free agent again. Not to mention, you sound like a complete imbecile and ungrateful prick in the process.
I'm not denying that what Dan Gilbert said wasn't true, but he's in no position to even imply it, much less ACTUALLY say it. In a typed letter. Not even in the Heat of the moment to a reporter. Gilbert took the time to sit down, think about what he wanted to say, edit it, and transcribe the document. Fool.
LeBron may have placed the dynamite at the base of the franchise, but you sir just lit the fuse. At least Cleveland has the Browns. Or Indians. And Mo Williams. Antawn Jamison? Oooooh! Grady Sizemore!!!
Huh? He sucks now? Well who the hell does the city of Cleveland have? Does Ohio St. count?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment